None of it makes since to me, if he did something that resulted in suspension of 2 or even 1 game then why didn’t he get ejected from the game? Obviously it wasn’t anything the ref thought was crossing a line other than throwing a flag or they would have ejected him then with his suspension to follow, but how can you throw a flag, give a warning, then no flags or ejections afterwards then come back and suspend a coach? Did they take it to the review box and say “oh yeah that’s definitely worth suspension, but not an ejection”.......smh....this is why people get riled up and start ranting about stuff on the forums. At least make sense of your reasoning, don’t come back later just because you felt the flag wasn’t enough in the game. That would be like taking a win from a team because you reviewed film and they had an illegal formation that wasn’t caught in the game. Ejection equals game suspension, no ejection equals yellow laundry on the field.......which was it a penalty or ejection?